Stanford Encyclopedia
The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy is an open-access encyclopaedia of philosophy. It was started in 1995 by John Perry and Edward N. Zalta with 2 entries. Then it was backed by Stanford University, and it currently contains more than 1150 articles, each counting more than 10.000 words on ...read on
Google Scholar
Google Scholar by Google Inc. is a search-engine for scholarly articles in any field, not just philosophy. It started in 2004, when Anurag Acharya and Alex Verstak took a sabbatical from working on the Google search-index. Their internally developed prototype of Google Scholar quickly became ...read on
PhilPapers
PhilPapers is an interactive database of (references to) writings in philosophy supported by the Centre for Consciousness at the Australian National University and the Institute of Philosophy in the School of Advanced Study at the University of London. It includes journal-articles, books, and (...read on
Constraints and Limits
The most important limitation of this paper is that it is mostly analytic in nature: E.g. concerned with resources, their properties, and reasons for them being significant. It does not have a strong empirical basis. While it is known of all discussed resources that they have at least tens of ...read on
Description
We will now give a short description of each of the three resources....read on
Choice of Resources
We limited our discussion to three resources in order to be able to devote enough attention to each. Resources were selected based on three general criteria: The first criterium was that the resources be broad. While there are good resources on specific philosophers or periods (such as ...read on
Introduction
In this paper we look at three important resources for philosophy: the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy , an online encyclopaedia of philosophy, Google Scholar , a search-engine for academic literature, and the PhilPapers project, a site that allows one to keep track of new publications. We will ...read on
Conclusion
Thus in a non-trivial sense, both common answers mentioned in the introduction: that of taking morality for granted, and that of arguing for being moral in terms of other ends, present sensible ways of seeing the relationship between reasons and morality. But instead of them being the two horns of ...read on
