Dutch judges protecting filthy psychiatrist

(accounting for "filthy")

How lovely to do so for a judge after four years of work on such a typically superhard case!

Being well experienced at getting humiliated in a vulnerable position, I partially recorded the 2,75 hour session on which I was to be financially destroyed by a psychiatrist hired on behalf of the GAK, Groningen.

The conversation was typed out phonetically to make the material easily accessible (for I was also already well experienced at the lazyness of judges not wishing to even read their pieces (I first think of Rechter Böttcher, Groningen)), let alone to listen to tapes. Though of course, for facilitating evidence, a copy of the record was offered just as well!

The written version of the verdict was not even motivated!

I felt it was legitimate to violate all rules and use the phone to ask Duursma directly: for the motivation - which was morally my right after so much work.

On answering the phone, he just made use of the rule that a judge is not allowed to speak on a verdict once issued. The bastard. He could savely have been honest: this was just a phonecall! I would certainly not have used this ever against him had he been honest, for honesty was all I asked for!

He told me to go into appeal.

Yesss, of.... course..... Very elegant to ask such a patently deeply handicapped person to go trough the whole ordeal once more, while probably even more than me being in a postion to know that the whole game was just to be repeated - with besides some other judge also even some 12-15 more lawyers, farther away in the country, nicely even making me have to pay the train!